Menu:

近期文章

譚生食經

自我介紹

小譚

30 代電腦男, 以林海峰的定義, 就係 3omething. 愛遊日本, 愛玩電腦, 近來迷上攝影, 雖非家財萬貫, 都叫做有個竇口. 家有一個女人, 兩隻貓, 幾部 Mac, 咁多老婆, 點算好?

文章分類

譚生日記 [164]
譚生談歌 [43]
譚生食經 [52]
2005 溫哥華梳乎之旅 [6]
蘋果日誌 [24]
2007 東京 [5]
2006 東京笑中有累之旅 [9]
2007 加拿大 [4]
貼文分享 [1]

網站連結

蘋果園
- 麥客見聞 Activity @ Mactivity
- 老地方冰果室
- 小麥草地
- imacguru
- 蘋狂陣
入門網站
- Engadget
- 電腦領域
- Mobile01
攝影展
- one day in my life :: hugo poon
- Candice's flickr
- SNAphoto
- Patrick Ho's Gallery
- innox's photo gallery
- dpreview.com
- The Luminous Landscape
- 巴斯的拍紙簿
- Dan Wong's Photo Gallery
- Lawrence Photo Studio
- MyTony.net
網友連結
- CR 琵琶湖支社
- 香港人在日本
- Mr. Riceball 的我要寫日本人
- 三十過後一個人住
- 港日夫婦善哉
- 自言摯語 by 罐罐糖
- fayecat
- Colocynth 的遊記
- nicthe photophilia
音樂社
- 文恩澄blog
- suk-e.com
- Kellyjackie
- This is my... Diary
- Phoebus Bus Stop
- Y 格

新聞交換

RSS 0.90
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

鳴謝



Version:

andreas01 v1.3

The Day after Tomorrow

2004.10.07 :: 星期四

Just bought this DVD and watched.  The movie was a shocker when I first watched in the theatres.  Yes, the story is too lame and special effects are just OK, but no doubt the movie is one of its kind and created some thoughts for me.  As witnessed by recent weather disruptions such as irregular typhoon season in the Asia Pacific area, hotter and hotter climate, it is very striking to watch the scenes in the movie that they seem to be actually HAPPENING in the real world.  Scary.

The bonus Disc is a real plus, I really watched the one-hour long "The Science of Tomorrow: The Science and Politics of Climate Change".  It is closely related to the movie and provided the background of the movie.  Though some of the presenters did not agree with the view points and dramatic exaggerations of the movie, the underlying problem of the world is the excessive use of fossil fuel energy and the political reasoning to block or interfere any migration to cleaner energy generation.

Yes, it's hard to imagine US being the largest single country to consume fossile fuel energy, at 25% of the world's production.  Thanks to its extensive network of highways which discourages the use of public transportation like railways and buses.  Most developed areas like Europe and Japan have extensive network of railways and the use of buses are popular.  Public transports are environmentally friendly and good for travellers, I always wonder why they would not be pushed in the US.  Privacy? Convenience? Maybe the lifestyle being adopted for long would not be easily changed.  I think the raising of gas prices these days could ring the bell and encourage US people to think twice about driving.

Yes, to be honest, I myself am not a huge fan of green life, because something got used to is not easily given up.   But I think everyone can do a bit of his or her own to protect our own home, like use less electricity, try to walk, or at least take public transports, recycle anything you can.  Talk to your legislators, create a pressure to the government that we wish for something more on environment protection policies.  It's really hard to imagine if the movie goes real.

記載於譚生日記. 現有 2 個回應.
«上一篇 | 下一篇»

  1. 1. fungboy  |  2004.11.17 :: 11:14

    人始終係自私自利,明明可以發展其他野代替石油,但為左利益寧願地陷。將來就算唔變成齣戲咁,自滅始終難免。

    有冇睇 dogville?

    睇下呢度(同 dogville 無關)
    http://72.3.131.10//gallery/1/


  2. 2. 小譚  |  2004.11.19 :: 13:52

    無睇 dogville, 你講開咁我又搵來睇睇先.

    hahaha... sorry sorry sorry...


發表迴響

  


 authimage